1. Tal Z. Zarsky, Information
Privacy in Virtual Worlds: Identifying Unique Concerns Beyond the Online and
Offline Worlds, 49 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 231 (2004
2. David R. Johnson, How
Online Games May Change the Law and Legally Significant Institutions, 49
N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 51 (2005).
3. Wollfgang Kleinwachter, From
Self-Governance to Public-Private Partnership: The Changing Role of Governments
in the Management of the Internet Core Resources, 11 Loy. L.A. L. Rev.
1103 (2003).
4. Jack M. Balkin, Law
and Liberty in the Virtual Worlds, 49 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 63, 67 (2005
5. The Internet
Domain Name System (Part I): Hearing Before the
Subcomm.
on Basic Research of the House Comm. on Sci., 105th Cong.. (1997)
[1] United Nations Convention on Law of the sea,
Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397
[1]
ICJ (1994)
[1]Supra Note 1.
[1] Martin A. Rogoff, An Overview of Existing
Maritime Boundary Disputes and recommendations for their Settlement, 15 ocean
and coastal L.J. (2010).
[1]
A Asgeirsdottir, M.C. Steinwand, Dispute settlement mechanisms and maritime
boundary settlement, Rev. Ind. Organ 10 (2015) 119-143
[1]
Aceris Law, law of the sea dispute settlement mechanism, International
Arbitration Attorney Network, (2015)
[1]ITLOS,
2012, Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between
Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal
[1] PCA, 2014, The Bay of Bengal maritime boundary
arbitration between People’s Republic of Bangladesh and republic of India.
[1]
Haroon Habib, Bangladesh wins maritime dispute with India, The Hindu, July 9,
2014
[1]
ICJ, 2021, Maritime Delimitation in the Indian ocean, Somalia v. Kenya
[1]
ICJ, Maritime Delimitation in the Caribbean sea and the Pacific ocean, 2018
[1] Monjur Hasan, He Jian , Wahidul Alam, and K.M.
Azam Chowdhury, Protracted Maritime Boundary Dispute and maritime laws, Journal
of International Maritime safety, (2019)
[1] Graham S. Pearson, The Threat of Deliberate Disease in the 21st Century,
18, BWP: Reasons for Concern, Courses of Action, 10, 14 (1998)
[1]Sheldon Harris., Japanese
biological warfare research on humans: a case study of microbiology and ethics,
666(1), Ann N Y Acad Sci ,21, 24-25 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb38021.x
[1] M. Leitenberg, The Korean War Biological Weapon Allegations: Additional
Information and Disclosures, 24(3), Asian Perspective, 159–17
(2002) http://www.jstor.org/stable/42704276
[1]Seeley, T. D., Nowicke, J. W., Meselson, M., Guillemin, J.,
& Akratanakul, P, Yellow rain, 253(3),
Scientific American,128-137 (1985) https://www.jstor.org/stable/24967794
[1] Staff Reporter, “Delhi University, photocopy service
in the dock over piracy”, The Hindu, August 14, 2012
[1] Id
[1]Infringement of copyright
[1]Sampsor and
Murdock v. Seaver-Radford Co., 140
Fed Cas 539 (541)
[1]The Indian Copyright Act 1975
[1]The Indian Copyright Act 1975
[1]Academy
of General Education, Manipal v. B. Manini Mallya 2009 (39) PTC 393 (SC).
[1]Fair dealing with any work not being used for a computer
program, for the purpose of private or personal use including research.
[1]The
Chancellor Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford v. Narendra
Publishing House and Ors. 2008 (106) DRJ 482 {TA \l "Syndicate of The
Press of The University of Cambridge on Behalf of The Chancellor, Masters and
Schoolv, B.D. Bhandari & Anr.andThe
Chancellor Masters And Scholars of The University of Oxfordv. Narendra
Publishing House and Ors.
[1]Rangarajan {TA \l "Chatrapathy
Shanmughan v. S Rangarajan"
\s "Chatrapathy Shanmughan v. S Rangarajan" \c 1}, (2004) 29 PTC
[1]A fair dealing with any work not being a
computer program for the purpose of private or personnel use
[1] Government of India study on piracy of copyright,
2011 by ministry of human resource development
CS(OS) No.2439/2012, IA No.76/2017 & IA
No.78/2017
[1]Order I Rule 10(2) for implement) and IA No.77/2017
(under
Order I Rule-8A CPC for intervention).
Citation
[1] Michael Brecher, The
Struggle for Kashmir, (New York 1953).
[1] Douglas C. Makeig,
War, No- War, and the India-Pakistan Negotiating Process, 60 PAC. AFF. 271, 278
(1987).
[1] Damodar R. SarDesai,
The Origins of Kashmir's International and Legal Status, in PERSPECTIVES ON
KASHMIR: THE ROOTS OF CONFLICT IN SOUTH ASIA 81 (Raju G.C. Thomas, ed. 1992).
[1] Sisir Gupta,
Kashmir, A Study in Indo-Pakistan Relations, (Bombay 1966).
[1] The Indian Independence, Act,
1947.
[1]
V. P. Menon, The Story of the Integration: of the Indian Princely States,
(Calcutta 1956).
[1] Alan Campbell
Johnson, Mission with Mountbatten, (London 1951).
[1] James Howley, Alive and
Kicking: The Kashmir Dispute Forty Years Later, 9 DICK. J. INT'L L.88 (1991).
[1] Letter from Lord
Mountbatten to Maharaja Hari Singh (Oct. 27, 1947), in CHRISTOPHER B. BIRDWOOD,
Two NATIONS AND KASHMIR 207 (1956).
[1]
Nafisur Rahaman Sufi, Kashmir's Bid for Freedom, (Muzaffarabad 1956,
Publication of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government, 1956).
[1] JAMMU AND KASHMIR
CONST. § 3. No amendments to this section are permitted under the constitution.
[1] INDIA CONST. art. 370.
[1]
Meher Chand Mahajan., Accession of Kashmir to India: The Inside Story,
(Sholapur 1950).
[1]
M. Zafrulla Khan, The Kashmir Dispute, (Karachi 1950).
[1] Reeta Chowdhari
Tremblay, Nation Identity and the Intervening Role of the State: A Study of the
Secessionist Movement in Kashmir, 69 PAC. AFF. 471, 483 (1996).
[1] Das Gupta, Jyoti
Bhushan, (1968), Jammu & Kahmir, Springer, p. 187.
[1] Das Gupta, Jyoti
Bhushan, (1968), Jammu & Kahmir, Springer, p. 200.
[1] Chowdhary, rekha, (2015),
Jammu & Kahmir: Politics of Identity & Separatism, Roultedge, p. 48.
[1] Gowher Rizvi, India,
Pakistan, and the Kashmir Problem, 1947 - 1972, in Perspectives on
Kashmir, supra note 4, at 58.
[1] Id. at 59.
[1] This pact was reinforced
by Pakistan's subsequent entry into the Central Treaty Organization (CENTO) and
the South East Asian Treaty Organization (SEATO).
[1] Chen,
Self-Determination as a Human Right, in TOWARD WORLD ORDER AND HUMAN DIGNITY
198 (W.M. Reisman & B. Weston eds. 1976);
[1]Article
1(2), 1 UNTS, 1945.
[1] Josef Korbel, The
Kashmir Dispute and the United Nations, 3 INT'L ORG. 278.
[1] Letter from the
Representative of India to the President of the Security Council (Jan 1, 1948),
U.N. Doc. S/628 (1948). In its complaint, India indicated that it would resolve
the accession issue once conditions in Kashmir allowed.
[1] Letter from the Minister
of Foreign Affairs of Pakistan to the Secretary General (Jan. 15, 1948), U.N.
Doc. S/646/Corr. 1 (1948).
[1] Resolution for a
Cease-Fire Order and Truce Agreement Adopted by the United Nations Commission
on Indian and Pakistan, U.N. SCOR, 3d Sess., at 3, U.N. Doc. S/995 (1948).
[1]Id. at 5.
[1] M.S. Rajan, The
Tashkent Declaration: Retrospect & Prospect, 01st Jan, 1966.
[1]Bratersky, Alexander (12 January 2016), At Tashkent, Soviet peace over
India and Paksitan, Russia Beyond website. Retrieved 24
July 2020.
[1]A leaf from history : Simla Agreement, at last. Dawn
(newspaper). 23 September 2012.
[1] Simla Agreement,
supra note 83, at art. VI.
[1]Agreement between the
Government of India and the Government of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan on
Bilateral Relations (Simla Agreement), United Nations Peacemaker.
[1]Article 103, 1 UNTS, 1945.
[1] Shamshad Ahmad,
“Reversing the tide of history: Kashmir policy - an overview-II” The Dawn.
August 6, 2004.
[1] Thomas P. Thornton,
“A Long Way to Lahore: India and Pakistan Negotiate” in Craig Baxter, Charles
H. Kennedy, (eds), Pakistan 2000, (Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2001),
P.67.
[1] Lahore Declaration
February, 1999 A Major Initiative for Peace in South Asia Amjad Abbas Maggsi.
[1]Office of the United
Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Update of the Situation of Human
Rights in Indian-Administered Kashmir and Pakistan-Administered Kashmir from June 2016 to April 2018, and General Human
Rights Concerns in Azad Jammu and Kashmir and Gilgit-Baltistan.
[1] Section 11(c), Basic Principles on the Use of
Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.
[1]
LOSING SIGHT IN KASHMIR – THE IMPACT OF PELLET-FIRING SHOTGUNS, Amnesty
International, INDIA.
[1] ICCPR/C/GC/37, General
comment no. 37 of 2020. Human Rights Committee.
[1]International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966,
999 UNTS 171, Artcile 4, No 47, [ICCPR].
[1]International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966,
999 UNTS 171, Artcile 7, No 47, [ICCPR].
[1] India : Stop using
Pellet – firing shot guns in Kashmir, Human Rights Watch, Sep 4, 2020.
[1] Id at 10.
[1]
John Cherian, International
reaction to abrogation of Article 370: Muted response, FRONTLINE, Sep 27, 2019.
[1] IAN BROWNLIE,
PRINCIPLES OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 1-31 (4th ed. 1990).
[1]Id at 49, supra note 97, at
1 I-15.
[1] JOSHUA CASTELLINO,
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND SELF-DETERMINATION 149 (2000).
[1] BROWNLIE, supra note 97,
at 129 (discussing application of the doctrine of inter temporal law).
Citation
[1]ArunJaitley, Minister of Finance, Corporate Affairs
and Information & Broadcasting, India,
Statement at the Thirty Third
Meeting of International Monetary and Financial Committee
[1]"India Development
Update", World Bank Report 151554
[1] Under the
Chairmanship of Shri S.S.Tarapore (former Deputy Governor)
[1] (1999) 4 SCC 69
[1] (2000) 100 Compo Cases 257 (Mad) (HC)
[1]AIR 1997 Guj.
75
[1] AIR 2000 SC 1535
[1]Saurav Harsh Son Of Shri Harish vs State Of Rajasthan
on 28 November, 2018
[1]Given in Third Schedule of the B. R. Act.
[1] Agreed upon by the members of the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision in 2010-11
[1] Introduced in Lok Sabha by the Minister of Finance,
Ms. Nirmala Sitharaman, on March 3, 2020
[1]https://www.livemint.com/news/india
[1] 1970 3 SCR 530
[1] (1989) 4 SCC
90
[1] AIR 1986 SC 1370
[1] AIR 1961 Mad 8
[1] 143 ER 441
[1] (2001)3 SCC 726
[1] AIR 2016
[1] Ibid.
[1] W.P. No. 21814 (W) of 2017
Citation
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The
Nature of the Judicial Process 19 (Yale University, 1961).
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The Growth of the Law xii
- xiv (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1] Cf. Pound, “Courts and
Legislation” 226, 9 Modern Legal Philosophy Series.
[1]Ibid.
[1]Act 43 of 1954.
[1] Act 2 of 1974.
[1] Prof. (Mrs.) Nomita Agarwal, Jurisprudence -(Legal
Theory) 63 (Central Law Publications, Allahabad, 4th Ed. 2003).
[1] Part III, The Constitution of
India.
[1] Right to free and compulsory
education under Article 21A is a new addition under the right to life in the
year 2002. The society felt the need to educate its children in order to make
them more aware of the social change taking place around him or her. The way it
was carried out was by law so as to make education a compulsory necessity for
all children up to 14 years of age.
[1] A. Lakshmi Nath, Precedent in The Indian Legal
System 16 (Eastern Book Company, Lucknow, 1990).
[1] A V Dicey, Lectures on the
relation between Law and Public Opinion in England during the Nineteenth
Century 362(1905).
[1]Investors Compensation Scheme
Ltd v. West Bromwich Building Society [1998] 1 All ER 98; Rainy Sky SA
v. Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, [2011] 1 W.L.R. 2900; Arnold v. Britton
[2015] UKSC 36, [2015] A.C. 1619; Wood v. Capita Insurance Services Ltd
[2017] UKSC 24, [2017] A.C. 1173.
[1]Marks & Spencer Plc v.
BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Co (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72,
[2016] A.C. 742.
[1]Marley v. Rawlings [2015]
AC 129.
[1]Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC
42, [2017] A.C. 467.
[1]Donoghue v. Stevenson
[1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1]Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v.
Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] A.C. 465
[1]Hedley Byrne (Supra); Caparo
Industries plc v. Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605; Customs and Excise
Commissioners v. Barclays Bank [2007] 1 AC 181.
[1]McLoughlin v. O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock
v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310
[1]Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd
v. Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd [1967] 1 A.C. 617.
[1]OBG v. Allan [2008] 1 AC
1.
[1] The Sale of Goods Act 1893 was
an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland
which regulated contracts in which goods are sold and bought. The whole of this
Act, except for Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1980, subject to a number
of savings. Section 26 was repealed on January 1, 1982. The 1893 Act is still
operative in Ireland, although it has been amended on a number of occasions
since it came into force.
[1]Nichol v. Godts (1854) 10
Ex. 191, Jones v. Just (1867-68) L.R. 3 Q.B. 197, Mody v. Gregson
(1868-69) L.R. 4 Ex. 49 and Drummond & Sons v. Van Ingen & Co
(1887) 12 App. Cas 284.
[1] [1932] AC 562, 1932 SC (HL) 31.
[1]Fons et origo is a Latin term meaning the
‘source and origin’.
[1]Anns v. Merton London Borough
Council [1978] AC 728, 751 per Lord Wilberforce.
[1]Murphy v. Brentwood District
Council [1991] 1 AC 398.
[1]Caparo Industries Plc v.
Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605, Michael v. Chief Constable of South Wales
Police [2015] UKSC 2, [2015] A.C. 1732; Robinson v. Chief Constable of
West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4; [2018] A.C. 736
[1]See, Lewis N Klar, Judicial
Activism in Private law (2001) 80 Canadian Bar Review 251-240.
[1]Cox v. Ministry of Justice
[2016] UKSC 10, [2016] A.C. 660.
[1]Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd. [2002] 1 AC 215
(sexual abuse); Mohamud v. WM Morrison Supermarkets Plc [2016] UKSC 11,
[2016] A.C. 677 (assault); Catholic Child Welfare Society v. Institute of
the Brothers of the Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 56, [2013] 2 A.C. 1 (the
concept of enterprise risk).
[1]Montgomery v. Lanarkshire
Health Board [2015] UKSC 11, [2015] A.C. 1430.
[1]Douglas and others v. Hello!
Ltd and others (No 3) [2008] 1 A.C. 1; Campbell v. Mirror Group
Newspapers [2004] 2 AC 457.
[1] Benjamin N. Cardozo, The
Growth of the Law 2 (Yale University Press, New Heaven and London, 1924).
[1]Indian
Evidence Act 1872, Act 1 of 1872, Section 53A.
[1]State
of U.P v. Pappu (2005) 3
SCC 594.
[1]Raja
v. State of Karnataka
(2016) 10 SCC 506.
[1]Lillu
v. State of Haryana (2013)
14 SCC 643.
[1]State
of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh
(1996) 2 SCC 384.
[1]State
of U.P v. Munshi ((2008) 9 SCC 390.
Citation
[1] Are
Fair Trials Possible In Today’s World Of Social Media, availale at:
https://www.iarani.com/blogs/are-fair-trials-possible-in-todays-world-of-social-media Are fair trials possible in today’s world of
social media? (last visited on 16th October 2020)
[1]Ibid
[1]
Robert Grant, Joseph Katz, The Great Trials of the Twenties: The
Watershed decade in America’s Courtrooms, Sarpedon, 1998.
[1] 200th Report of the Law Commission on “Trial
by Media: Free Speech v Fair Trial Under Criminal Procedure (Amen
dmentstotheContemptofCourtAct,1971)”
[1] Tata Press Ltd. v. Mahanagar
Telecom Nigam Ltd., AIR 19955SCC 139
[1] State of Kerala and Anr. v. N.M. Thomas and Ors., AIR
1976SC 490.
[1] Justice R.S. Chauhan Trial by
Media: An International Perspective, available at:
http://www.supremecourtcases.com/index2.php.,last visited on 14th
October 2020.
[1] Abolish Rather & Konica Satan, Judicial
Intervention in the Sub-judice-The emerging issues of Trial by Media, Bharati
Law Review, (2015).
[1](1992) 2 SCC
105
[1]
What is the Jessica Lall murder case?, available at: https://www.google.com/amp/s/indianexpress.com/article/what-is/what-is-the-jessica-lal-murder-case/lite/(last visited on 17th October 2020)
[1]Ibid
[1](2010) 9 SCC 747
[1] Nupur Talwar v Central
Bureau of Investigation and Another (AIR 2012 SC 1921)
[1]Arpan Banerjee, judicial
Safeguards Against “Trial By Media” : Should Blasi’s “Checking Value” Theory
Apply In India? Vol.2,p. 28,Journal of Media Law& Ethics, (2010).
[1]
Article 129- “The Supreme
court shall be a court of record and shall have all powers of such a court
including the power to punish for contempt of
itself”
Article 215-
“Every High Court shall be a court of record and shall have all the powers of
such a court
including power to punish for contempt of itself”
[1]ibid
[1] Commissioner, Agra v Rohtas
Singh, AIR 1998 SC 685
[1] (2007) 98 DRJ 41.
Citation 2
65876451 adaskdjlkh lkhlkhasd
IJLRA
N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 5 Issue 8 2022 Page 1-6
IEEE
N. Raj Kumar ; Kamble Shivadayal . "Design of Fault Tolerance Parallel FFT’s Using Xilinx 14.5v" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 5(8)