The reasoning which is given in Bhatia International V/S Bulk Trading was limited and confined to its own understanding but instead of evolving the understanding, the court reverse the whole notion in the BALCO case, the author tried to give an understanding while analysing the reason the need of Part I to be applied even when the Arbitration Dispute was chaired outside India, with giving the peculiar reasoning for it. However, the fallacies continued and narrowed the role of the judiciary in an arbitration proceeding. Thus, the non-provision of  Interim measures can often result in making the whole arbitration meaningless